We need new technology breakthroughs in the energy field. Many green energy supporters have the best of intentions, and they really do want to believe. Unfortunately, science doesn’t seem to be on their (our) side.
Author Robert Bryce writes this regarding why, given current battery technology, electric cars are not a viable alternative to combustion engines.
“The problem is very simple,” Bryce said. “It’s not political will. It’s simple physics. Gasoline has 80 times the energy density of the best lithium ion batteries. There’s no conspiracy here of big oil or big auto. It’s a conspiracy of physics.”
The quote is pulled from John Stossel’s article Going Green on RealClearPolitics.com. Worth reading.
As on many issues, I find myself in the middle of two extremes. Although it over simplifies the issue I’ll pose it like this: either we stop using oil at all costs or we keep using it at all costs. No doubt, many vociferous advocates/investors in both camps stand to make a lot of money by winning, or at least maintaining, the debate.
The issues are much too politicized, though I’m not sure how that can be rectified.
Though I’m not sure how it lines up with classical Libertarian beliefs (still new to me), it seems that the government should be involved in the research process (interstate commerce?) I don’t believe depending solely on the private sector is best. Perhaps foundations, non-profits, etc… offer the best of both worlds.
No doubt, some combination of all available solutions will help until new technologies are discovered or further developed. I’d like to see us continue to do the things that will position us for possible breakthroughs. It can’t be done for free. Who’s going to pay? (that’s always the question) While that’s going on, I’d like to see us continue to become more efficient with gasoline and transportation. (this coming from a 4 car family)
Posted in Current Events | Comments (0)
Posted on Tuesday, 1st June 2010 by Bill Bean
